Comparación de dos cortes y tres tipos de podas y su influencia en las características agronómicas de rosas

Authors

  • Gabriel de Jesús Ibarra Martínez Depto. de Fitomejoramiento de la UAAAN
  • Sathyanarayanaiah Kuruvadi Profesor investigador del Depto. de Fitomejoramiento de la UAAAN
  • Leobardo Bañuelos Herrera Profesor investigador del Depto. de Fitomejoramiento de la UAAAN
  • Alfonso López Benítez Profesor investigador del Depto. de Fitomejoramiento de la UAAAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v15i2.245

Keywords:

variability, quality, stem thickness, floral bud, floral life

Abstract

In this investigation 20 genotypes of rose varieties with a broad spectrum of variability for different agronomic traits were evaluated in the greenhouse “The Capulin”, with an object of comparing two cuttings and three types or pruning and to study their influence on different agronomic characteristics, of indentify superior varieties of roses in quality and to study phenotypic correlations between different pairs of characters. 

The two cuttings and three prunings (ascent, descent and stipulate) were carried out when the genotypes were two years or growth. A randomized block design was used with factorial arrangement of three factors ABC namely A = Cutting (cutting 1 and cutting 2); B = Pruning (ascent, descent and stipulate); C = Varieties (20 genotypes). Data was recorded on ten characters. 

The analisis of variance showed significant differences for all the characters stud ied among genotypes. The differences were nonsignificant between three prunings. The two cuttings of rose flowers increased the values of the following characters: stem length, stem diameter, maternal stem diameter, floral arrangement and number of petals and increased the quality of flowers. The ascending pruncing was the best in the production of quality flowral stem. The varieties Marlises, Vivaldi, Liberty and Royalty were identified as superior for the majority of the characters studied. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball Red Book. 1984. “Greenhouse growing”. New Yersey. 14th edición. De. A. Reston Book. U.S.A.

Byrne, T.G. and Doss, R.P. 1981. Development time of “Cara mia” rose shoots as influenced by prunning position andparentshoot diameter. Journal of the American So ciety for Horticulture Science. 106 (1). U.S.A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.106.1.98

Espinoza, C. 1992. La floricultura una industria joven. Revista Escala Año III, número 35. México D.F.

Ferrer, M.F. y Palomo S. 1986. La producción en rosas en cultivo protegido. Edit. Universal Plantas S.A. San José de la Rinconada. Sevilla, España.

Heitz, H. 1992. Rosas. Asesoramiento técnico sobre su plantación, cultivo, poda y reproducción. 1a edición. Editorial Everest. España.

López, R.H.A y Bañuelos, H.L. 1993. Influencia del criterio de corte y unidades calor para la cosecha de cuatro cultivares de rosal. Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencias Hortícolas A.C. V Congreso Nacional de Horticultura. Universidad Cristóbal Colón. Veracruz, Ver.

Murrieta, F.R y Bañuelos, H.L.1993. Influencia del diámetro de tallo madre y unidades calor en la producción de cuatro cultivares de rosa. Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencias Hortícolas A.C. V Congreso Nacional de Horticultura. Universidad Cristóbal Colón. Veracruz, Ver. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.1993.02.012

Downloads

Published

1999-12-15

Issue

Section

Artículos de divulgación

How to Cite

Comparación de dos cortes y tres tipos de podas y su influencia en las características agronómicas de rosas. (1999). Agraria, 15(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v15i2.245

  PLUMX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>