Evaluation of a milk replacer made with sunflower seed and soybean meal in artificial raising kids
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v9i1.468Keywords:
Saanen Kid goat, feed conversion, feed intakeAbstract
The maintenance and development of the kidgoats for milk production on many farms are done through artificial rear ing goats by early separation of mother and baby to prevent mother-child bond, and thus, the kid goat develops the ability to feed itself. The aim of this study was to evaluate a nutri tious milk replacer, physically similar to goat milk in a kid artificial rearing system. Saanen kids were fed during seven weeks with: a) a milk substitute formulated with sunflower seed and soybean meal (SSMS), b) commercial milk substi tute (CMS), and c) goat milk (GM). The evaluated variables were: daily weight gain (DWG), feed intake liquid (FIL), con sumption of solid food (CSF) and feed conversion (FC). The substitute was prepared with soybean meal, sunflower seeds, soy lecithin, and milk powder. Kids were weighed at baseline and every week to calculate DWG, the FIL and CSF was re corded daily. In the third week pelleted food (Súpercría®) was offered to kid goats. Birth weight was used as a covariate to evaluate DWG. A completely randomized design with five replicationswas used. There was a higher consumption of GM, followed by the CMS, the SSMS consumption was lower (p<0.0001). The DWG were higher with the GM, followed by the CMS and the lowest (p=0.003) to the SSS. There was no difference in FC between treatments (p=0.15). Breastfeeding does not compare with the useof GM replacers; however, the milk replacer formulated with vegetable protein is an option for raising kids.
Downloads
References
AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis. 16th Ed. Asociación Oficial de Química Analítica. Washington, DC, USA. 600 p.
García de H., Sánchez, C., Colmenares, J. 1998. Evaluación comparativa de tres sistemas de amamantamiento de cabritos bajo explotaciones intensivas. Zootecnia Tropi cal 16(1): 87-98
Gutiérrez, M. J., 2007. Estrategias de Alimentación de la cabra lechera, CEPIPSA, FMVZ, UNAM, México. 8 p. Hernández-Clua, O.D., A. Valverde, M. Mañas, J.A. Naranjo y E. Martínez de Victoria.1988. Vacia-miento abomasal en cabritos lactantes II. Influencia de la alimentación sobre el patrón de vaciamiento de proteína y grasa de la ingesta abomasal. Archivos de Zootecnia 37(139): 277-282.
Meza, H., G., Salinas, C., Cadena. 1984. Evaluación de dos dietas líquidas en una lactancia artificial para cabritos. Primera Reunión Nacional sobre Caprinocultura. Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Saltillo, Coah., México.
Peña, F., V., Doménech, R., Acero, J., Perea, A. García. 2009. Efecto de sistemas de crianza (Leche de cabra vs. Sustituto Lácteo) y sexo en cabritos de raza Florida sobre su crecimiento y características de la canal. Revista Científica, FCV-LUZ. 19(6): 619 – 629.
Ramírez, A., A. Quiles, M.L. Hevia, F. Sotillo y M.C. Ramírez. 1996. Influence of forced contact on the ma ternal-filial bond in the domestic goat after different periods of postpartum separation. Small Rum. Res. 23: 75-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(96)00916-9
Sahlu, T., Carneiro, H., El Shaer, H.M., Fernández, J.M. 1992. Production performance and physiological re sponses of Angora goat kids fed acified milk replacer. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1643-1650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77921-1
Shimada Miyasaka, A., 2003. Nutrición Animal. Ed. Trillas,México, DF. 388 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PLUMX Metrics