Biotechnology for resilience in the urban-rural gradient

Authors

  • Angel Roberto Martínez Campos Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
  • Lizbeth Carillo Arzimendi Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México
  • Mariana Carolyn Cruz Mendoza Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Valle de Bravo
  • Gabriela González Vazquez Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Valle de Bravo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v23iE1.743

Keywords:

bioremediation, circular economy, diffuse pollution, gene editing, molecular biology, soil degradation

Abstract

The urban-rural gradient constitutes a continuous and dynamic socioecological system, in which natural, productive, and urban processes are closely intertwined, generating direct effects on human health, food security, and biodiversity. The pressures arising from urbanization, agricultural intensification, and climate change highlight the need for integrated approaches that strengthen territorial resilience without fragmenting their social and environmental components. In this context, biotechnology emerged as a strategic tool capable of articulating differentiated solutions along the gradient, provided that it is applied from an ethical, participatory, and systemic perspective. Its potential lies not only in technological innovation but also in its capacity to integrate local knowledge and respond to the specific needs of each context, from densely populated urban areas to rural and peri-urban landscapes. The applications analyzed—including generative traditional regenerative production systems, resilient agricultural practices, local bioinputs, and genetic and ecological conservation strategies—demonstrate that biotechnology can simultaneously strengthen food security, environmental health, and livelihood stability. These experiences show that there is no single solution, but rather a set of adaptable tools that enable context-specific responses aligned with the social and ecological diversity of the urban-rural gradient. In this way, biotechnology, conceived as a bridge between scientific innovation and community knowledge, is consolidated as a key for promoting more just, functional, and regenerative territories capable of sustaining human well-being without compromising the integrity of the ecosystems that support them

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Casanoves, M.; González, Á.; Salvadó, Z.; Haro J.; Novo, M. (2015) Knowledge and attitudes towards biotechnology of elementary education preservice teachers: The first Spanish experience. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 2923–2941. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1116718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1116718

Díaz-Caamaño, A. (2024) Agricultura en la ciudad: Una ruta hacia la cultura del bienestar y de la sostenibilidad. Academia XXI 15(29), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.22201/fa.2007252xp.2024.15.29.88657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fa.2007252Xp.2024.15.29.88657

Engelmann, F. (2011). Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 47(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/101007/s11627-010-9327-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-010-9327-2

Fonseca, M.J.; Costa, P.; Lencastre, L.; Tavares, F. (2012) Multidimensional analysis of high-school students’ perceptions about biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 46, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.634019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.634019

Frankham, R.; Ballou, J.D.; Ralls, K.; Eldridge, M.; Dudash, M.R.; Fenster, C.B.; Lacy, R.C.; Sunnucks, P. (2017) Genetic management of fragmented animal and plant populations. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198783398.001.0001

Glare, T.R.; O’Callaghan, M. (2000) Bacillus thuringiensis: Biology, ecology and safety. John Wiley & Sons.

Glick, B.R. (2010) Using soil bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation. Biotechnology Advances 28(3), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.02.001

González, J.A.; López, R. (2019) Uso de biofertilizantes en agroecosistemas chinamperos: alternativas sostenibles frente a agroquímicos. Terra Latinoamericana, 37(4), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v37i4.345

Grimm, N.B.; Faeth, S.H.; Golubiewski, N.E.; et al. (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319(5864), 756–760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195

Grupo Ceres (2021) El cultivo de maíz frente a la sequía en México. CIMMYT. https://www.cimmyt.org/es/noticias/el-cultivo-de-maiz-frente-a-la-sequia-en-mexico/

Hilty, J.A.; Worboys, G.L.; Keeley, A.; et al. (2021) Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridors. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.PAG.30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.PAG.30.en

Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). (2022) Selección de líneas de maíz por su tolerancia a sequía y calor. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 45(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2022.45.2.123

Intergovernamental Panel on Climate change (IPCC). (2022) Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

Lal, R. (2015) Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability 7(5), 5875–5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055875

Lederman, N.G. (2019) Incursión de la biotecnología en la educación: Tendencias e implicaciones. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias 18(2), 345–362. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77629802018

Manosalva-Caicedo, J. (2024) Conectividad ecológica y conservación en paisajes fragmentados: retos para América Latina. Revista Colombiana de Ecología 29(1), 15–32. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co

Mata, T.M.; Martins, A.A.; Caetano, N.S. (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(1), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020

Naciones Unidas (1992) Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. Río de Janeiro: Naciones Unidas. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-es.pdf

Nasr, M. A.; Eissa, N. (2025) Rural and Urban Pollution. 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394208180.ch35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394208180.ch35

Occelli, M.; Vilar, M.T.; Valeiras, N. (2011) Conocimientos y actitudes de estudiantes de la ciudad de Córdoba (Argentina) en relación a la biotecnología. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 10, 227–242.

Open AI. (2026) Ejemplos de aplicaciones de bacterias y plantas en la biorremediación de suelos contaminados por la industria. [Imagen generada por inteligencia artificial]. Copilot. https://copilot.microsoft.com/

Open AI. (2026) Variedades de hortalizas y frutales obtenidas mediante selección asistida por marcadores (MAS) y edición genética (CRISPR-Cas9), adaptadas a condiciones de estrés como sequía, salinidad y altas temperaturas. [Imagen generada por inteligencia artificial]. Copilot. https://copilot.microsoft.com/

Open AI. (2026) Procesos de digestión anaeróbica de residuos orgánicos urbanos y agroindustriales para la producción de biogás y biofertilizantes, junto con el cultivo de microalgas en aguas residuales tratadas para la captura de CO₂. [Imagen generada por inteligencia artificial]. Copilot. https://copilot.microsoft.com/

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO). (2020) Biodiversity for food and agriculture and ecosystem services – Thematic Study for The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb0649en DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb0649en

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO). (2021) Manual de educación en bioética. Volumen I. Montevideo: UNESCO / Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Disponible en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org

Ortiz-Hernández, J.M.; Vovides, A.P.; Díaz-Toribio, M.H. (2025) Germination of cloud forest native shrubs with potential for restoration in central Veracruz, Mexico. Acta Botánica Mexicana, (132), e2365. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm132.2025.2365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm132.2025.2365

Ruiz-González, C.; López-Banet, L.; Ayuso-Fernández. G.E. (2025) Applications of biotechnology in the environment: Arguments from Spanish secondary school students. Sustainability 17(15), 6768. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156768

Vörösmarty, C.J.; McIntyre, P.B.; Gessner, M.O.; et al. (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467(7315), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440

Zambrano, L.; Valiente, E. (2020) Restauración ecológica en sistemas chinamperos: integración de biofiltros y conservación del ajolote. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91(3), e913597. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2020.91.3.913597

Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Wei, P.; et al. (2014). The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnology Journal 12, 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12200

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

How to Cite

Biotechnology for resilience in the urban-rural gradient. (2026). Agraria, 23(E1). https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v23iE1.743

  PLUMX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)