Cost benefit index for tillage systems

Authors

  • Martin Cadena-Zapata Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, CP 25315. Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
  • Juan Antonio López-López Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, CP 25315. Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
  • Gilbert Fresh López-López Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, CP 25315. Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
  • Jesús Rodolfo Valenzuela-García Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, CP 25315. Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
  • José de Jesús Vargas-Arellano Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, CP 25315. Saltillo, Coahuila, México.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v19iSE1.27

Keywords:

cost-benefit analysis, conservation tillage, cost of tillage operations

Abstract

Tillage operations are among the crop production activities that demand a high amount of energy. The cost of energy from fossil fuels has increased continuously so conservation tillage which uses less operations is a good option to decrease production costs. The objective of this work was to compare the production costs under two conservation tillage systems (No tillage and Vertical Tillage)
with the production cost of Conventional Tillage in the production of forage oats. To calculate the costs, it was measured the use of fuel at each tillage operation, work capacity of the configuration  ractor implement and the crop yield as well as the costs of the tractor and implements. With the total cost and benefit at each system it was calculated de Cost-Benefit Index. The highest benefit was obtained under the vertical tillage (index = 2.19) for each monetary unit invested, the earns were 1.19 units. The conventional tillage had a cost benefit index of 2.02 with net gains of 1.02 of monetary units and zero tillage had an index of 1.98 which means a net gain of 0.98 monetary units for each invested unit.Vertical tillage had 14% and 17% more gains compared to conventional and zero tillage. The latter two systems had a very similar cost benefit with differences only of 3% among them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrios G., Alejandra I., 1996. Costo energético de las operaciones mecanizadas. biblioteca.inia.cl/biblioteca/detalle.php?c=120495&materia=N20&nr=23067&f=1&pagina=1 biblioteca.inia.cl/medios/biblioteca/informativos/NR41410.pdf

Carrasco J., Abarca P., Catalán A. 2019. Metodología de cálculo de costos de uso de maquinaria agrícola para el cultivo de Maíz. http://biblioteca.inia.cl/medios/biblioteca/informativos/NR41410.pdf [09 de noviembre de 2019].

Carter, M.R. 1994. Conservation Tillage in Temperate Agroecosystems. Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida, 390 pp.

Chen , Y., S. Damphousse and H. Li. 2016. Vertical tillage and vertical seeding. The Canadian Society of Bioengineering. 2016. Annual Conference Halifax, Canada.

FAO/INTA. 1992. “Manual de sistemas de labranza para América Latina”, Boletín de suelos de la fao, no. 66, 193 pp., Roma, Italia.

FAO. 1990. Energy Consumption and Input Output Relation in Field Operations, CNRE, Study no. 3, Rome, Italy.

Kojima, M. 2013. Drawing a Roadmap for Oil Pricing Reform. In Household Savings in Central Eastern and Southeastern Europe: How Do Poorer Households Save? The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.

Li H., Wang X., He J., McHugh A.D., Li W., Gao H., Kuhn N. 2006. The adoption of annual subsoiling as conservation tillage in dryland maize and wheat cultivation in northern China

López A., Cadena M., Campos S., Zermeño A., Mendez, M. 2019. Comparison of Energy Used and Effects on Bulk Density and Yield by Tillage Systems in a Semiarid Condition of Mexico. Agronomy 9(189) 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040189

Rodríguez, R.G. 2017. La simple aritmética de la nueva política de precios de las gasolinas y el diesel. Economía Informa, 404, 40-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecin.2017.05.011

Ordóñez M., K.D., Cadena Z., M., Campos M., S.G., Zermeño

G., A. 2019. Effect of Tillage systems on physical properties of a clay loam soil under oats. Agriculture 9(62): 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9030062

Sena. 2019. Elementos de Máquinas. https://repositorio.sena.edu.co/sitios/elementos_maquinas/vol12/volumen12.html# [09 de noviembre de 2019].

Sharma, P.; Abrol, V.; Sharma, R. 2011. Impact of tillage and mulch management on economics, energy requirement and crop performance in maize–wheat rotation in rainfed subhumid inceptisols, India. Eur. J. Agron, 34, 46-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.10.003

SIAP. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Infografías agroalimentarias. Available online: https://nube.siap.gob.mx/gobmx_publicaciones_siap/pag/2018/Infografias-2018 (accessed on 30 March 2019).

Steiner, K.G. 1998. Conserving Natural Resources and Enhancing Food Security by Adopting No Tillage; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH: Rossdorf, Germany.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-02

Issue

Section

Artículos de divulgación

How to Cite

  PLUMX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)