Evaluación de genotipos de tomate considerando criterios fisiológicos, fenológicos y de rendimiento, bajo condiciones de alta temperatura, en invernadero

Authors

  • Mariano Guerra Hernández Alumno de maestría en Fitomejoramiento
  • Fernando Borrego Escalante Profesor Investigador de la Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro
  • Arnoldo Oyervides García Profesor Investigador de la Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro
  • José Manuel Fernández Brondo Profesor Investigador de la Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v15i1.252

Keywords:

Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, photosynthesis, transpiration

Abstract

12 Tomatoes genotype with wide genetic diversity were evaluated from April to October 1993, under intensive production conditions and under high temperature in greenhouse. For taking effect on statistical analysis correspondent to group the variables under study in :phenologics variables, physiologics, quantitatives and qualitatives of the yield. In physiologic variables, dates of evaluation and leaf position showed effects highly significatives in Photosynthesis, Transpiration, Stomatal Conductance and Efficient Use of Water. Genotypes showed significative differences for photosynthesis and transpiration, and highly significative for efficient use of water. In the comparison of means for physiologic variables, the genotypes Montecarlo, Israel and Floradade, were those of highest Photo synthesis. For the factor day hours, Photosynthesis, Efficient Use of Water and Stomatal Conductance, reached the highest medium worth for de morning. Transpiration reached the highest worth at noon. For the phenologic variables, the best genotypes for number of days in harvest, were Sunny and Montecarlo. In quantitative variables of yield, for number of fruits for plant the best genotype was Pixie Hybrid II. For middle weight fruits was the genotype Supersteack, and for number of cutting for plant the best was the genotype Montecarlo. Positive and significative correlation were detected between days at last harvest and kilograms for plant and between transpiration and yield and between others pairs of variables. The path analysis, found that photosynthesis and transpiration presented a direct effects very high an yield, with a high positive correlation. In general, the variables that most to influence yield were number of days in harvest, photosynthesis, transpiration and number of fruits for plant. The genotypes 83 (Floradade) and 34 (Celebrity) were the best. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aspeitia H. F. 1994. Rendimiento y fenología de genotipos de tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) evaluados bajo condiciones de altas temperaturas en invernadero. Tesis de licenciatura. UAAAN.

Bar-Tsur, A., J. Rudich and B. Bravdo. 1985. Photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal resistance to gas exchange in tomato plants under high temperatures. Jour nal of Horticultural Science (1985)60 (3)405-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1985.11515645

Casseres, B. 1981. Producción de hortalizas. 3ª edicion. Ed. IICA. San Jose Costa Rica. Crosbie, T.M., R.B. Pearce, and J.J. Mock 1981. Recurrent Phenotypic selection for high and Low photosynthesis in two maize population. Crop Sci. 21:736-740 (1981). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100050027x

Dali, N., D. Michaud and S. Yelle, 1992. Evidence for the involment of sucrose phosphate, synthase in the pathway of sugar accumulation in Sucrose-Accumulating tomato-fruits. Plant Physiol. 99:434:-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.2.434

Elkind, Y., A. Gurnick and N. Kedar. 1991. Genetics of semideterminate growth habit in tomato. Hort. Sci. 26(8):1074-1075. 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.26.8.1074

Fernandez, B.J.M. 1992. Apuntes de introducción a la Fisiología Vegetal. Curso de maestría. UAAAN. Sin editar.

Folquer F. 1976. El tomate. Estudio de la planta y su producción comercial. Edit. Hemisferio sur. S.R.L. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Sec ond Edition. An international Rice Research Institute Book. A. Wiley Interscience publication, John Wiley & Sons.

Gull, D.O. 1989. Stability differences among fresh market tomato genotypes: II Fruit Qual ity. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114(6):950-954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.114.6.950

LI-Cor Inc. 1990. L1-6200 Portable photosynthesis system. Li- cor, Inc. Lincoln, Nebraska, 68504 USA.

Lips, S.H., E.O. Leidi, M. Silberbush, M.I.M. Soares and O.E.M. Lewis. 1990. Physiological aspects of ammonium and nitrate fertilization. Journal of plant nutrition, 13(10): 1271-1289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169009364151

Little T.M. and F.J. Hills. 1985. Métodos estadísticos para la investigación en la agricultura. Sexta reimpresión. Ed. Trillas. México.

Mahon, J.D. and S.L.A. Hobbs 1981. Selection of peas for photosynthesis CO2 Exchange Rate under Field Conditions Crop Sci. 21:616-621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100040034x

Mc Avoy, R.J. and H. W. Janes. 1989. Tomato plant photosynthetic activity as related to Canopy Age and Tomato Development. J. Amer. Soc. Hort Sci. 114(3): 478- 482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.114.3.478

Mehta, H. and K.R. Sarkorn. 1992. Heterosis for leaf photosynthesis, grain yield and yield components in maize. Euphytica 60:161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026807

Mendoza, H.J.M. 1984. Diagnóstico climático para la zona de influencia inmediata de la UAAAN. Depto. de Agrometeorología.

Mosqueda, V.R. y J. Molina G. 1974. Estudio de caracteres correlacionados y análisis de componentes de rendimiento empleando coeficientes de sendero en Carica papaya L. Agrociencia. 11:3-4

Nederhoff E., Giezen J. and Vegter, F. 1989. Measurement an simulation of crop photosyn thesis of cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) in greenhouse. Horticultural Ab stract. Vol. 59: Num 2 Pg. 127.

Palmer, A.F.E. y R. Goldsworthy. 1971. Programa de Agronomía y Fisiología del CIMMYT. Cuarta conferencia sobre mejoramiento de maíz en la zona árida. ICA-CIAT Palmira, Colombia Nov- 2-5.

Papadópulos A. P. and Douglas P. Ormord. 1988. Plant spacing effects on photosynthesis, and transpiration of the greenhouse tomato. Can J. Plant Sci. 68:1209-1218. Pasternark, D., M. Twersky and Y. de Malach. 1979. Salt resistance in agricultural crops. in: H. Musell and R.C. Staples (eds) Stress physiology in crop plants. John Wiley. New York pp. 127-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps88-150

Radin E.A. 1988. Correlación de la conductancia estomática con la capacidad fotosintética de algodón en una atmósfera enriquecida con CO2 Mediación para ácido abscisico. Plant Physiol. (1988) 88, 1058-1062.

Ray, L.L., C.W. Wendent, B. Roark and J.E. Quisenberry. 1974. Genetics modification of cotton plant for more efficient water use. Agric. Met. 14:31-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(74)90008-9

Reyes V.M.H. y A.A Andrade A. 1991. Relaciones entre caracteres cuantitativos y la resistencia al ataque de pájaros en girasol. (Helianthus Annuus L.). Memorias del II Congreso Nacional de Genética, Saltillo, Coahuila.

Reyes V.M.H. 1993. Análisis de senderos con el paquete Matlab. Laboratorio de Genética biométrica. Departamento de Fitomejoramiento. UAAAN, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coah.

Rodriguez, B.R. and Lambeth, V.N. 1975. Artificial lighting and spacing as photosynthetic and yield factors in winter greenhouse tomato culture. J. Am. Soc. Horti. Sci. 110:694-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.100.6.694

Srivastava, L.S. and S.C.P. Sachran. 1973. Genetics Parameters, correlation coefficient and path-coefficient analysis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Indian Agric. Sci. 43(6): 604-607

Steel R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie 1989 principles y procedures of statistics. A biometrical apprach. Ed Mac Graw Hill L.T.D. Tokio, Japan.

Toovey, F.W. 1965. Producción comercial de tomate. Editorial Acribia. Zaragoza, España. Wells, G. and F. Buitelar. 1989. Factors affecting soluble solids contents of Muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Horticultural Abstracts. 59(2):129.

Wright, S. 1921. Correlation and causation. Journal Agric. Res. 20:557-58. Zamora V., V.M. 1992. Apuntes del curso de Genética estadística. Maestría en Fitomejoramiento. Sin editar. UAAAN.

Downloads

Published

1999-06-30

Issue

Section

Artículos de divulgación

How to Cite

Evaluación de genotipos de tomate considerando criterios fisiológicos, fenológicos y de rendimiento, bajo condiciones de alta temperatura, en invernadero. (1999). Agraria, 15(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v15i1.252

  PLUMX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>