Efecto de la fecha de parto sobre características productivas y reproductivas de vacas Charolais

Authors

  • Daniel Pérez Torres Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
  • Roberto García Elizondo Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
  • Ramiro López Trujillo Departamento de Nutrición y Alimentos, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro
  • Jesús Manuel Fuentes Rodríguez Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.
  • Fernando Ruiz Zarate Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v8i2.459

Keywords:

Beef cattle, calf weaning weight, calving interval

Abstract

Effect of Calving date on Reproductive and Productive Characteristics of Charolais Cows. In order to assess, along two consecutive years, the effect of the calving date on postpartum reproductive and productive characteristics of meat-producing Charolais cattle with a short-term breeding time and annual free range grazing. A group of 1,665 records belonging to 583 Charolais cows, for two consecutive years, were analyzed. The records were grouped according to birth date into four calving groups (G1=1-21, G2=22-42 =, G3 = 43-63, and G4>63) of 21 consecutive days. A completely randomized design, with different numbers of replications and covariates was applied. There was not a significant effect (P> 0.05) from calving date on the weight at birth of calves. The weaning weight of calves born in G1 in two consecutive years, was higher than those born in groups G2, G3 and G4. Calves born in G4 had a higher preweaning daily gain in both years (P <0.05) than those born in the groups G1, G2 and G3. G1 cows weaned in two consecutive years 26, 46 and 69 kg/calf over the cows of groups G2, G3 and G4. The mating and pregnancy days were inverse to those of the calving group, while the open days showed a direct dependence of these two variables, G1 cows became pregnant 11, 25 and 41 days before the cows in groups 2, 3 and 4. The days to next calving and Julian day following calving increased from G1 to G4 and both were inverse to the interval between calvings. It is concluded that matings of 90 days in summer, cows calving in early spring have a better productive and reproductive postpartum behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beef Improvement Federation (BIF). 2002. Guidelines for uniform beef improvement programs. 8th edition. Will iam D. Hohenboken (Ed.). Animal & Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia Athens, GA, USA. 165 p. http://www.beefimprovement.org/library/ 06guidelines.pdf

Bourdon, R.M., and J.S. Brinks. 1983. Calving date ver sus calving interval as reproductive measure in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 57: 1412-1418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.5761412x

Carpenter, B.B. 1998. Beef cattle reproduction in the south Texas region of Tamaulipas Biotic Province. pp. 145- 152. In: Memorias del Taller de Ganadería de Bovinos de Carne del Noreste de México y Sur de Texas. Unidad Académica Multidisciplinaria Agronomía y Ciencias. Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Cd. Victoria, Tamps., México.

Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). 2006. Comisión Nacional del Agua. Saltillo, Coah., México. pp: 85-97.

Cundiff, L.V., R. Nunez, G.E. Dickerson, K.E. Gregory, and R.M. Koch.1992.Heterosis for lifetime production in Hereford, Angus, Shorthron and crossbred cows. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 2397-2405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.7082397x

Deutscher, G.H., J.A. Stotts and M.K. Nielsen. 1991. Ef fects of breeding season length and calving season on range beef cow productivity. J. Anim. Sci. 69:3453- 3460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6993453x

Drennan, M.J., and D.P. Berry. 2006. Factors affecting body condition score, live weight and reproductive per formance in spring-calving suckler cows. Irish J.Agric. Food Res. 45: 25-38.

Forni, S., L. Talarico, L. G. de Albuquerque. 2003. Análise genética da característica dias para o parto em bovinos da raça Nelore. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 11: 143- 148.

García E., R. 2006. Factores nutricionales y de manejo que afectan la eficiencia productiva y reproductiva de vacas Charolais y Hereford en agostadero. Tesis Doc tor en Ciencias. Universidad Autónoma Agraria Anto nio Narro. Saltillo, Coah., México. pp: 74-80.

García, P.J.A., R. Alberio, M.C. Miquel, M.O. Grondona, J. Carrillo, and G. Schiersmann. 1992. Effects of calv

ing date on lifetime productivity of cows in a winter calving Aberdeen Angus herd. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 177- 184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100037430

Goyache, F., J.P. Gutiérrez, I. Fernández, L.J. Royo, and I. Álvarez. 2005. Genetic analysis of days open in beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 93: 283-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.10.002

Grings, E.E., R.E. Short, K.D. Klement, T.W. Geary, M.D. MacNeil, M.R. Haferkamp, and R.K. Heitschmidt. 2005. Calving system and weaning age effects on cow and preweaning calf performance in the Northern Great Plains. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 2671-2683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83112671x

Grings, E.E., T.W. Geary, R.E. Short, and M.D. MacNeil. 2007. Beef heifer development within three calving systems. J. Anim. Sci. 85: 2048-2058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-758

Guerra, I.D., J.L.E. Villavicencio, A.P. Espinosa, D.G. Pená, F.R. Almeidac, and A.G. Trujillo. 2009. Componentes de (co)varianza de los días abiertos en bovinos Santa Gertrudis. Téc. Pecu. Méx. 47: 145-155.

Gutiérrez, J.P., I. Álvarez, I. Fernández, L.J. Royo, J. Díaz, and F. Goyache. 2002. Genetic relationship between calving date, calving interval, age at first calving and type traits in beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 78: 215- 222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00100-8

Houghton, P.L., R.P. Lemaneger, L.A. Horstman, K.S. Hendrix, and G.E. Moss. 1990. Effect of body compo sition, pre- and postpartum energy level and early wean ing on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. J. Anim. Sci. 65: 1438-1446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6851438x

Johnston, D.J., and K.L. Bunter. 1996. Days to calving in Angus cattle: Genetic and environmental effects, and covariances with others traits. Livest. Prod. Sci. 45: 13-22 (Abstr). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(95)00088-7

López de Torre, G., and J.S. Brinks. 1990. Some alterna tives to calving date and interval as measures of fertil ity in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68: 2650-2657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6892650x

Luna de la Peña, R., D.G. Iglesias, D.G. Peña, J.L.E. Villavicencio, A.P. Espinosa, and R.N. Domingúez. 2008. Componentes de (co)varianza de caracteres reproductivos y su relación genética con el peso al destete en el ganado Cebú de Cuba. Téc. Pecu. Méx. 46: 225-234.

MacGregor, R.G., and N.H. Casey. 2000. The effects of maternal calving date and calving interval on growth performance of beef calves. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 70-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v30i1.3880

Marshall, D.M., W. Minqiang, and B.A. Freking. 1990. Relative calving date of first-calf heifers as related to production efficiency and subsequent reproductive per formance. J. Anim. Sci. 68: 1812-1817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6871812x

Melton, B.E. 1995. Conception to consumption: The eco nomics genetic improvement. pp: 49-47. In: Proc. Beef Improvement Federation 27th Research Symposium and Annual Meeting, Sheridan, Wyoming.

Osterman, S., and J. Bertilsson. 2003. Extended calving interval in combination with milking two or three times per day: effects on milk production and milk composi tion. Livest. Prod. Sci. 82: 139-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00036-8

Osoro, K., and I.A. Wrigth. 1992. The effect the body condition, live weigth, breed, age, calf performance, and calving date on reproductive performance of spring calving beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 1661-1666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.7061661x

Pate, F.M. and W.E. Kunkle. 2003. Weaning beef calves at a later age to increase production. CIRS328. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Science. University of Florida. FL, USA. pp. 1-5.

Perry, G., R. Daly, and T. Melroe. 2009. Increasing your calf crop by management, pregnancy testing, and breeding soundness examination of bulls. Bull. Ex2068. College of Agriculture & Biological Sci

ences. South Dakota State University. SD, USA. pp: 1-5.

Peterson, G.A., T.B. Turner, K.M. Irvin, M.E. Davis, H.W. Newland, and W.R. Harvey. 1987. Cow and calf per formance and economic considerations of early wean ing of fall-born beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 64: 15-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.64115x

SAS. 1989. SAS/Stat. User´s Guide (Release 6.12). SAS inst. Inc. Cary, NC, USA.

Walker, J., and G. Perry. 2007. Cow condition and repro ductive performance. pp: 1-6. In. Proceedings: The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX. Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Werth, L.A., S.M. Azzam, and J.E. Kinder. 1996. Calving interval in beef cows at 2, 3 and 4 years of age when breeding is not restricted after calving. J. Anim. Sci. 74: 593-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.743593x

Yagüe, G., F. Goyache, J. Becerra, C. Moreno, L. Sánchez, and J. Altarriba. 2009. Bayesian estimates of genetic parameters for pre-conception traits, gestation length and calving intervals in beef cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 114: 72-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.09.015

Downloads

Published

2011-08-30

Issue

Section

Artículos de divulgación

How to Cite

Efecto de la fecha de parto sobre características productivas y reproductivas de vacas Charolais. (2011). Agraria, 8(2), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.59741/agraria.v8i2.459

  PLUMX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>